Churches Are Illegal If 501c3 Non Profit Tax Exempt – To truly be a non-reporting tax immune (exempt) Christian body you should be non 501c3. Here is a little bit of Why!
Set up properly since the trust is an independent free exercise of the Christian religion by a peaceable assembly (the assembly is of the trust creator, exchanger, trustee(s), etc…) under contract there is no tax reporting requirements because as we learned “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,…” and “…this is a contract, the obligation of which can not be impaired without violating the constitution of the United States.” Because common law contract pure trusts and bodies established under the Christion religion are not subject to legislative restrictions, therefore, there are no legislative requirements put on establishments of the Christian religion like this type of trust.
Furthermore, the trustee of the trust has the rights of a citizen of the several united States of America of original jurisdiction, which rights according to the United States Supreme Court include the right to not have to divulge private business information for his or her businss that is not a licensed business activity.
Morrissey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 296 US 344 (1935)
“The fact that a business trust is not regarded as a legal entity distinct from its trustees, if a true trust… may result in this advantage to the trust, which a corporation does not possess: The trust consists of individuals…who are Citizens, and who, therefore, are entitled to certain rights and immunities such as those guaranteed by the privileges and immunities clauses (Art. IV, §2. Cl. 1) of the Federal Constitution, which do not apply to Corporations.”
Article. IV, §-2. Clause-1:
“The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.”
Hale v. Henkle, 201 US 43
“…there is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the state. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.
Since 1905 the case of Hale v. Henkle has been cited by the US Supreme Court over 144 times, and by the lower Federal and State courts over 1,600 times.
